DB2 - Problem description
Problem IT05485 | Status: Closed |
STMM LOCKLIST TUNING DECREASES FAIL REPETITIVELY ATTEMPTING TO REDUCE LOCKLIST SIZE MORE THAN WHAT CAN BE FREED | |
product: | |
DB2 FOR LUW / DB2FORLUW / 970 - DB2 | |
Problem description: | |
The STMM tuner may log frequent messages to the STMM log files about failing to decrease the Locklist. This is because the calculation is based on locklist "in use", with the assumption that remaining locklist "not in use" can be freed. However, some of the "not in use" locklist may be spread around on partially-used larger units of memory managed within the locklist, and those areas cannot be freed. The STMM tuner needs to determine how many larger units of memory are completely free in order to correctly determine the maximum possible reduction in locklist size. STMM log messages about locklist decrease tuning failures appear similar to : EDUID : 99999 EDUNAME: db2stmm (SAMPLE) 0 FUNCTION: DB2 UDB, Self tuning memory manager, stmmUpdateDBConfig, probe:290 MESSAGE : ZRC=0x82AE00A6=-2102525786=STMM_DYNAMIC_UPDATE_FAILED "STMM dynamic update failed" DATA #1 : String, 78 bytes Dynamic update failed for parameter Locklist. Attempted update value is 100000 Note that isolated appearances of these messsages may still be normal due to timing. Even when repetitive messages occur, the impact on STMM tuning overall is minimal. | |
Problem Summary: | |
**************************************************************** * USERS AFFECTED: * * Systems using STMM to tune LOCKLIST * **************************************************************** * PROBLEM DESCRIPTION: * * See Error Description * **************************************************************** * RECOMMENDATION: * * Problem is cosmetic and can be ignored * **************************************************************** | |
Local Fix: | |
Solution | |
Problem first fixed in DB2 Version 9.7 Fix Pack 11 | |
Workaround | |
not known / see Local fix | |
Timestamps | |
Date - problem reported : Date - problem closed : Date - last modified : | 10.11.2014 23.10.2015 23.10.2015 |
Problem solved at the following versions (IBM BugInfos) | |
9.7.FP11 | |
Problem solved according to the fixlist(s) of the following version(s) | |
9.7.0.11 |