home clear 64x64
en blue 200x116 de orange 200x116 info letter User
suche 36x36
Latest versionsfixlist
14.10.xC11 FixList
12.10.xC16.X5 FixList
11.70.xC9.XB FixList
11.50.xC9.X2 FixList
11.10.xC3.W5 FixList
Have problems? - contact us.
Register for free anmeldung-x26
Contact form kontakt-x26

Informix - Problem description

Problem IT11351 Status: Closed

ER DATASYNC THREAD LEAKS MEMORY IN CDRD POOL ON TARGET NODE WHEN A SINGLE
TRANSACTION DELETES LARGE NUMBER OF ROWS

product:
INFORMIX SERVER / 5725A3900 / C10 - IDS 12.10
Problem description:
When a single transaction deletes a large number of rows which
have cascade deletes and triggers that execute UDRs, the target
node seems to consume/leak huge amounts of memory in CDRD pool.
On an informix instance setup with small SHMTOTAL such as 500mb
the delete causes an Out of Memory situation.  The memory
consumption can be seen by running "onstat -g mem" as shown
below:

IBM Informix Dynamic Server Version 12.10.UC5W1X3 -- On-Line --
Up 01:35:19 -- 525620 Kbytes

Pool Summary:
name         class addr            totalsize    freesize
#allocfrag #freefrag
CDRD_1       V     48435028 384778240 71947352 1560302    55105
Problem Summary:
****************************************************************
* USERS AFFECTED:                                              *
* All users                                                    *
****************************************************************
* PROBLEM DESCRIPTION:                                         *
* See Error Description                                        *
****************************************************************
* RECOMMENDATION:                                              *
* Update to IBM Informix Server 12.10.xC6                      *
****************************************************************
Local Fix:
Solution
Workaround
not known / see Local fix
Timestamps
Date  - problem reported    :
Date  - problem closed      :
Date  - last modified       :
21.09.2015
30.12.2015
30.12.2015
Problem solved at the following versions (IBM BugInfos)
12.10.xC6
Problem solved according to the fixlist(s) of the following version(s)
12.10.xC6 FixList